Australian authors are outraged after discovering that Meta may have utilized their books without consent to train its AI systems.
‘No consent’: Australian authors ‘livid’ that Meta may have used their books to train AI
March 25, 2025
0 Comments
One thought on “‘No consent’: Australian authors ‘livid’ that Meta may have used their books to train AI”
Leave a Reply
Explore More
World’s first “Synthetic Biological Intelligence” runs on living human cells
Introducing the world’s first “Synthetic Biological Intelligence” powered by living human cells!
Long Discontinued Arnott’s Fruit Granita – Aldi Version
Aldi’s Take on the Long Discontinued Arnott’s Fruit Granita Spotted these at Aldi today: Fruit and Fibre Oat Biscuits These biscuits bear a striking resemblance to the long-gone Arnott’s Fruit
PSA: blood donations are needed this week, if you can spare a half hour to help top up the national supply
Attention everyone: Blood donations are urgently needed this week! If you can spare just half an hour, please consider helping to boost the national blood supply. Your contribution can make
It’s understandable that Australian authors are upset about their works being used without consent to train AI systems. Intellectual property rights are crucial for protecting creators’ interests, and many authors feel that their contributions should be acknowledged and compensated. The debate surrounding AI training datasets is complex, involving issues of copyright, fair use, and the ethics of AI development. It’s essential for corporations like Meta to establish clear guidelines and agreements with authors to ensure that their work is respected and that they receive appropriate recognition and remuneration. Open conversations about these issues could lead to fairer practices in the use of creative content in AI training.