‘No consent’: Australian authors ‘livid’ that Meta may have used their books to train AI
March 25, 2025
0 Comments
One thought on “‘No consent’: Australian authors ‘livid’ that Meta may have used their books to train AI”
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Explore More
Is it safe? (fridge)
Is it safe to use? (Fridge) I recently purchased a fridge for my new home, but I noticed that the power cable got frayed during the move upstairs. Should I
A former NSW Police officer who told strangers online he was a “dirty paedo dad” and was prepared to pay for “underage fantasy and kink” has been jailed for at least six months.
A former NSW Police officer has been sentenced to at least six months in prison after admitting to online strangers that he was a “dirty paedo dad” and was willing
Parents of Australia, I recall in the mid 80’s early 90’s we’d roam the neighbourhood on our bikes, walk to local milkbar and park, play in the street with the other kids.
Reflecting on Childhood Freedom: Comparing Past and Present Parental Perspectives in Australia In the 1980s and early 1990s, Australian children often enjoyed a level of freedom that many modern parents
It’s understandable that Australian authors are upset about their works being used without consent to train AI systems. Intellectual property rights are crucial for protecting creators’ interests, and many authors feel that their contributions should be acknowledged and compensated. The debate surrounding AI training datasets is complex, involving issues of copyright, fair use, and the ethics of AI development. It’s essential for corporations like Meta to establish clear guidelines and agreements with authors to ensure that their work is respected and that they receive appropriate recognition and remuneration. Open conversations about these issues could lead to fairer practices in the use of creative content in AI training.