Australian authors are outraged after discovering that Meta may have utilized their books without consent to train its AI systems.
‘No consent’: Australian authors ‘livid’ that Meta may have used their books to train AI
March 25, 2025
0 Comments
One thought on “‘No consent’: Australian authors ‘livid’ that Meta may have used their books to train AI”
Leave a Reply
Explore More
‘A serious wake-up call’: Cyclone Alfred exposes weaknesses in Australia’s vital infrastructure
‘A Critical Wake-Up Call’: Cyclone Alfred Reveals Vulnerabilities in Australia’s Essential Infrastructure
Thought we’d take a scenic detour, went to heaven instead.
We decided to take a beautiful detour and ended up in paradise! My girlfriend and I were traveling back to Melbourne from the Grampians through Horsham. Although we initially planned
Peter Dutton’s seat is the most marginal in Queensland. Meet the women taking him on
Peter Dutton’s constituency is the closest contest in Queensland. Introducing the women who are challenging him.
It’s understandable that Australian authors are upset about their works being used without consent to train AI systems. Intellectual property rights are crucial for protecting creators’ interests, and many authors feel that their contributions should be acknowledged and compensated. The debate surrounding AI training datasets is complex, involving issues of copyright, fair use, and the ethics of AI development. It’s essential for corporations like Meta to establish clear guidelines and agreements with authors to ensure that their work is respected and that they receive appropriate recognition and remuneration. Open conversations about these issues could lead to fairer practices in the use of creative content in AI training.