Australian authors are outraged after discovering that Meta may have utilized their books without consent to train its AI systems.
‘No consent’: Australian authors ‘livid’ that Meta may have used their books to train AI
March 25, 2025
0 Comments
One thought on “‘No consent’: Australian authors ‘livid’ that Meta may have used their books to train AI”
Leave a Reply
Explore More
Gen Z and Millennials will decide the imminent Australian election, and the almost eight million voters under 45 years of age are bringing disaffection and disengagement to the polling booth.
The upcoming Australian election will be heavily influenced by Gen Z and Millennials, with nearly eight million voters under 45 demonstrating a sense of disillusionment and disengagement as they head
Jetstar found my lost luggage, but then ghosted me
Jetstar located my lost luggage, but then went silent on me. I’m curious if this is a common experience. I arrived in Japan on February 28th, and the following day
Why the Whyalla steelworks must be publicly owned
The Case for Public Ownership of the Whyalla Steelworks
It’s understandable that Australian authors are upset about their works being used without consent to train AI systems. Intellectual property rights are crucial for protecting creators’ interests, and many authors feel that their contributions should be acknowledged and compensated. The debate surrounding AI training datasets is complex, involving issues of copyright, fair use, and the ethics of AI development. It’s essential for corporations like Meta to establish clear guidelines and agreements with authors to ensure that their work is respected and that they receive appropriate recognition and remuneration. Open conversations about these issues could lead to fairer practices in the use of creative content in AI training.