Australian authors are outraged after discovering that Meta may have utilized their books without consent to train its AI systems.
‘No consent’: Australian authors ‘livid’ that Meta may have used their books to train AI
March 25, 2025
0 Comments
One thought on “‘No consent’: Australian authors ‘livid’ that Meta may have used their books to train AI”
Leave a Reply
Explore More
Police release footage of multiple violent road rage incidents following arrest of Canberra man
Police have published footage showing several violent road rage incidents that occurred after the arrest of a man in Canberra.
Housing stats clouded by Labor’s careful wording | Media Watch
Housing Statistics Obscured by Labor’s Strategic Language | Media Watch
Australians have lost hope in the fair go, with profound implications for the election
Australians are losing faith in the idea of a fair go, which could have significant consequences for the upcoming election.
It’s understandable that Australian authors are upset about their works being used without consent to train AI systems. Intellectual property rights are crucial for protecting creators’ interests, and many authors feel that their contributions should be acknowledged and compensated. The debate surrounding AI training datasets is complex, involving issues of copyright, fair use, and the ethics of AI development. It’s essential for corporations like Meta to establish clear guidelines and agreements with authors to ensure that their work is respected and that they receive appropriate recognition and remuneration. Open conversations about these issues could lead to fairer practices in the use of creative content in AI training.