Australian authors are outraged after discovering that Meta may have utilized their books without consent to train its AI systems.
‘No consent’: Australian authors ‘livid’ that Meta may have used their books to train AI
March 25, 2025
0 Comments
One thought on “‘No consent’: Australian authors ‘livid’ that Meta may have used their books to train AI”
Leave a Reply
Explore More
PSA – Vegemite and Toast
Public Service Announcement: Vegemite on Toast Just wanted to share my experience at a cafe where they served me a ridiculous amount of Vegemite. Seriously, look at how much they
Median-income households can only afford just over a third of advertised rentals, according to a new report from real estate research body PropTrack.
According to a recent report from PropTrack, a real estate research organization, median-income households can only afford a little over one-third of the available rental listings.
Predator Unmasked: Community Leader Jailed for Rapes on a community
Predator Exposed: Community Leader Sentenced for Serial Rapes A prominent Indian community leader has received a lengthy prison sentence for committing “elaborately executed, manipulative, and highly predatory” sexual assaults on
It’s understandable that Australian authors are upset about their works being used without consent to train AI systems. Intellectual property rights are crucial for protecting creators’ interests, and many authors feel that their contributions should be acknowledged and compensated. The debate surrounding AI training datasets is complex, involving issues of copyright, fair use, and the ethics of AI development. It’s essential for corporations like Meta to establish clear guidelines and agreements with authors to ensure that their work is respected and that they receive appropriate recognition and remuneration. Open conversations about these issues could lead to fairer practices in the use of creative content in AI training.