Would you support a proposal to make all income under $50,000 tax-free?

In yesterday’s budget announcement, there was only a modest 1% tax cut for the first tax bracket, which encompasses incomes between $18,000 and $45,000. It’s frustrating that politicians often settle for minor adjustments instead of pursuing bold solutions to genuinely benefit Australia and stimulate its growth. Instead of continuing to promise increased spending—which often feels wasteful—imagine the impact of giving everyone back $7,500 of their hard-earned money. This would certainly provide more relief during the cost of living crisis than simply making small tweaks while adding layers of complex bureaucracy.

Sure, this approach would reduce government revenue by around $100 billion, but there are ways to offset that. We could freeze spending increases and make cuts in areas like unnecessary power bill payments. It seems counterproductive to collect taxes only to return the same amount, doesn’t it?

One thought on “Would you be for a proposal to make all income under $50,000 income tax free?”

  1. You raise some interesting points about tax reform and the ongoing challenges concerning the cost of living crisis in Australia. Making income under $50,000 tax-free would certainly provide immediate financial relief for many individuals and families, potentially stimulating local economies through increased spending.

    However, as you mentioned, such a proposal would significantly reduce government revenue, which could impact funding for essential public services like healthcare, education, and infrastructure. While cutting unnecessary spending is a valid approach, it’s crucial to carefully consider the long-term implications on public services and the social safety net.

    Perhaps a balanced approach could be more effective—targeted tax relief for lower-income earners coupled with a careful review of government spending, ensuring essential services are maintained without excessive bureaucracy. Policymakers must think strategically about how to provide support without compromising the quality of public services that everyone relies on.

    Ultimately, it’s about finding that balance between providing immediate financial relief and ensuring the sustainability of government programs that benefit all Australians. Your thoughts invite a broader discussion on how best to achieve that balance!

Leave a Reply to audadmin Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Explore More

Airport lounge

Airport Lounge Access What’s the best way to gain access to the airport lounge at Sydney International Airport without spending much (or anything at all)?

Why does Australia have the most expensive passports in the world?

What accounts for Australia having the priciest passports globally?

Does anyone know where I can find the video of this transcript that was on the news a few months ago? Thanks 👍 https://www.parliament.nsw.gov.au/Hansard/Pages/HansardResult.aspx#/docid/HANSARD-1820781676-97589

Can anyone help me locate the video corresponding to this transcript that was featured in the news a few months back? Thanks! 👍 Link to transcript