War Memorial Chairman Kim Beazley has no issues accepting ‘dirty money’ from weapons manufacturers.

One thought on “Taking weapons makers’ ‘dirty money’ not a problem for war memorial chairman Kim Beazley”

  1. It’s important to consider the broader context of funding for war memorials and the potential impact of accepting donations from industries associated with violence. While some may view it as “dirty money,” others argue that the funds can support important initiatives that honor those who served and sacrificed. It raises a significant ethical debate about the sources of funding for memorials and the message it sends to the public. Ultimately, the priority should be ensuring that we respect and remember the contributions of veterans while also being mindful of the implications of where our funding comes from. What are your thoughts on balancing these concerns?

Leave a Reply to audadmin Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Explore More

Victoria’s Parliament drops automatic licence bans for cannabis using drivers

Victoria’s Parliament eliminates automatic license suspensions for drivers using cannabis.

Snowy 2.0 project safety review underway after ventilation fan implodes

Safety review for the Snowy 2.0 project is currently in progress following the implosion of a ventilation fan.

Optus customer service?

Optus Customer Service: What Happened? I need to vent a bit—when did Optus’s customer service decline so dramatically? I’ve encountered several representatives who have given me inaccurate information regarding my