War Memorial Chairman Kim Beazley has no issues accepting ‘dirty money’ from weapons manufacturers.

One thought on “Taking weapons makers’ ‘dirty money’ not a problem for war memorial chairman Kim Beazley”

  1. It’s important to consider the broader context of funding for war memorials and the potential impact of accepting donations from industries associated with violence. While some may view it as “dirty money,” others argue that the funds can support important initiatives that honor those who served and sacrificed. It raises a significant ethical debate about the sources of funding for memorials and the message it sends to the public. Ultimately, the priority should be ensuring that we respect and remember the contributions of veterans while also being mindful of the implications of where our funding comes from. What are your thoughts on balancing these concerns?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Explore More

Lost thousands in your super this week? This is why you shouldn’t worry

Did you see a significant dip in your superannuation this week? Here’s why you shouldn’t stress about it.

Update on Coles magpie

Here’s the latest on the Coles magpie!

Scott Morrison accuses Albanese of acquiescing to ‘bully’ China

Scott Morrison claims that Albanese is conceding to China’s ‘bullying’ tactics.