Australian authors are outraged after discovering that Meta may have utilized their books without consent to train its AI systems.
‘No consent’: Australian authors ‘livid’ that Meta may have used their books to train AI
March 25, 2025
0 Comments
One thought on “‘No consent’: Australian authors ‘livid’ that Meta may have used their books to train AI”
Leave a Reply
Explore More
NT coroner examines toddler’s death after medical incident at Humpty Doo childcare centre
NT Coroner Investigates Toddler’s Death Following Medical Incident at Humpty Doo Childcare Center
Can we re-live sayings we used in highschool/childhood for a sec?
How about we take a trip down memory lane and revisit some of the phrases we used in high school and childhood? Here are a few examples: giving someone a
Natural Confectionary Lollies Recipe Change
Change in Natural Confectionary Lollies Recipe Has anyone else noticed that the natural confectionery lollies seem different lately? The sweetness, especially in the snakes and party mix, just doesn’t taste
It’s understandable that Australian authors are upset about their works being used without consent to train AI systems. Intellectual property rights are crucial for protecting creators’ interests, and many authors feel that their contributions should be acknowledged and compensated. The debate surrounding AI training datasets is complex, involving issues of copyright, fair use, and the ethics of AI development. It’s essential for corporations like Meta to establish clear guidelines and agreements with authors to ensure that their work is respected and that they receive appropriate recognition and remuneration. Open conversations about these issues could lead to fairer practices in the use of creative content in AI training.