Australian authors are outraged after discovering that Meta may have utilized their books without consent to train its AI systems.
‘No consent’: Australian authors ‘livid’ that Meta may have used their books to train AI
March 25, 2025
0 Comments
One thought on “‘No consent’: Australian authors ‘livid’ that Meta may have used their books to train AI”
Leave a Reply
Explore More
How the NT’s housing crisis is forcing sick and elderly people into a cycle of homelessness
The Impact of the Northern Territory’s Housing Crisis on Vulnerable Populations In recent times, the Northern Territory has been grappling with a significant housing crisis that is having dire consequences
Anyone know Fat Pizza?
Discovering Fat Pizza: A Comedy Phenomenon Are you familiar with Fat Pizza? This iconic Australian sitcom has left a lasting mark on the comedy landscape with its unique blend of
What my local Coles Gold Coast supermarket looks like, 7 days after Cyclone Alfred.
Here’s what my local Coles supermarket on the Gold Coast looks like seven days after Cyclone Alfred. Chicken Section Additional Chicken The sausages and mince were completely sold out. The
It’s understandable that Australian authors are upset about their works being used without consent to train AI systems. Intellectual property rights are crucial for protecting creators’ interests, and many authors feel that their contributions should be acknowledged and compensated. The debate surrounding AI training datasets is complex, involving issues of copyright, fair use, and the ethics of AI development. It’s essential for corporations like Meta to establish clear guidelines and agreements with authors to ensure that their work is respected and that they receive appropriate recognition and remuneration. Open conversations about these issues could lead to fairer practices in the use of creative content in AI training.