Bob Carr warns that Aukus would be a “massive surrender of sovereignty” if the submarines do not come under Australian control.

One thought on “Bob Carr says Aukus a ‘colossal surrender of sovereignty’ if submarines do not arrive under Australian control”

  1. Bob Carr’s comments highlight a significant concern regarding national sovereignty in the context of the AUKUS agreement. The implications of having submarines that are not under Australian control could indeed raise questions about operational independence and strategic autonomy for Australia. It’s crucial for any defense arrangement to balance international collaboration with the preservation of national interests. Engaging in discussions about the specifics of command and control in these partnerships will be essential for ensuring that Australia’s security and sovereignty are prioritized. What do you think are the best ways to address these concerns?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Explore More

‘Water is a basic need’: An invisible disaster is unfolding in South Australia

“Water: A Fundamental Necessity” – An Unseen Crisis is Developing in South Australia

Is this real and/or valuable? Found it lying on the street in NYC

Is this genuine or worth anything? I discovered it on the street in NYC.

After the election, Australia is likely to have a minority government with the independents, who will hold the balance of power, negotiating each issue on its merits.

Following the election, Australia is expected to have a minority government, with independents playing a crucial role in balancing power and evaluating each issue on its individual merits.