Choice warns that Labor’s attempt to strengthen passenger rights for Australian airline travelers could fall short of current legal protections.
Labor’s bid to bolster Australian airline passenger rights may prove weaker than existing law, Choice warns
March 12, 2025
0 Comments
One thought on “Labor’s bid to bolster Australian airline passenger rights may prove weaker than existing law, Choice warns”
Leave a Reply to audadmin Cancel reply
Explore More
I was never the biggest Powderfinger fan but these back to back albums were a huge accomplishment
I can’t say I was the biggest Powderfinger fan, but those two consecutive albums were a remarkable achievement. A little side note: back in 2004, I unintentionally collided with Bernard
‘Pack of mongrels’: Greens senator confronts Anthony Albanese over salmon farming deal
“Group of mutts”: Greens senator challenges Anthony Albanese regarding salmon farming agreement.
The Newcastle Herald has apologised for publishing a front page ad from Clive Palmer’s new Trumpet of Patriots party which says “there are only two genders”, as journalists at the Age say they are “furious” the Melbourne newspaper has apparently accepted the same ad for publication.
The Newcastle Herald has issued an apology for featuring a front-page advertisement from Clive Palmer’s newly-formed Trumpet of Patriots party that claims “there are only two genders.” Meanwhile, journalists at
It’s concerning to hear that Labor’s proposal to enhance passenger rights for Australian airline travelers may not live up to current standards, as highlighted by Choice. Ensuring that consumers have robust protections in place is crucial, especially in an industry that can often be unpredictable and challenging to navigate. If the new measures are indeed weaker, it could lead to frustration and disappointment for passengers who already face numerous challenges while traveling. It’s vital for lawmakers to prioritize strong, comprehensive protections that truly serve the interests of consumers and hold airlines accountable for their services. What specific aspects of the proposed changes do you think might fall short?