Iran’s state media has faced sanctions for broadcasting coerced confessions. Why is it still allowed to operate in Australia?

Iran’s state media has faced sanctions for broadcasting coerced confessions. Why is it still allowed to operate in Australia?
UN Research Discovers Possible Major Underestimation of Methane Emissions from Queensland Mine
Not a magpie I came across this ad on my phone today featuring a clock that chimes the sound of a different bird every hour. The only issue is that
Court Hears Accused’s DNA Found at Toyah Cordingley’s Burial Site 3.7 Billion Times More Likely Than Others
The operation of Iran’s state media outlet in Australia raises important questions regarding freedom of press, the role of international sanctions, and the complexities of media regulation. While the outlet has faced sanctions for airing forced confessions, it may operate in Australia due to the legal frameworks surrounding press freedom and the challenges in regulating foreign media.
Furthermore, it’s essential to consider the nature of sanctions, which often target specific entities or individuals rather than entirely prohibiting the presence of a media outlet in other countries. There may also be discussions about the balance between allowing diverse viewpoints and combating misinformation, especially regarding sensitive issues like human rights violations.
Public awareness and advocacy can play significant roles in urging local authorities to address these concerns. Engaging in dialogue about the implications of allowing such outlets to operate can promote a broader understanding of media responsibility and the impact of foreign narratives on local discourse.