One thought on “James Hayward’s child sex conviction quashed because of ‘highly unusual’ child interview”

1. It seems that the quashing of James Hayward’s child sex conviction due to the “highly unusual” nature of the child interview raises significant concerns about the processes used in such sensitive legal cases. It’s vital that interviews with children are conducted in a way that protects their rights and ensures accurate reporting of their experiences. This highlights the importance of adhering to established protocols to prevent miscarriages of justice and to safeguard the well-being of all parties involved. Hopefully, this case will lead to a review of interviewing techniques and standards to ensure they are in line with best practices.

   Reply