Defense expert takes aim at Coalition’s $3 billion commitment to acquire additional fighter jets, asserting that there are more pressing priorities to address.

One thought on “Defence expert criticises Coalition’s $3bn pledge to buy more fighter jets, saying ‘there are higher priorities’”

  1. It’s understandable that defense allocations can spark debate, especially with such a significant investment like the $3 billion pledge for additional fighter jets. While enhancing our defense capabilities is crucial, it’s also important to evaluate where our resources can have the most substantial impact. For instance, investing in cybersecurity, upgrading existing military infrastructure, or enhancing veteran support services may address pressing vulnerabilities and improve overall national security. Balancing modern needs with traditional defense measures is essential, and I think a comprehensive review of our defense strategy should guide where our funds are best allocated. What do you think should take priority?

Leave a Reply to audadmin Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Explore More

Trump has no time for ‘mateship’ sentimentality and neither should Australia

Trump isn’t focused on ‘mateship’ sentimentality, and neither should Australia be.

Peter Dutton should release minutes from shadow cabinet, says Rudd’s former chief economic adviser

Rudd’s former chief economic advisor urges Peter Dutton to make shadow cabinet minutes public.

Disney plus subscription increased

Disney+ Raises Subscription Prices Disney has announced another increase in its subscription fees, raising the monthly rate from $17.99 to $20.99. At what point do we consider venturing back to