Defense expert takes aim at Coalition’s $3 billion commitment to acquire additional fighter jets, asserting that there are more pressing priorities to address.
Defence expert criticises Coalition’s $3bn pledge to buy more fighter jets, saying ‘there are higher priorities’
March 7, 2025
0 Comments
One thought on “Defence expert criticises Coalition’s $3bn pledge to buy more fighter jets, saying ‘there are higher priorities’”
Leave a Reply to audadmin Cancel reply
Explore More
[no-politics] UnAustralian Monday 17/Mar/2025
[No Politics] Un-Australian Monday 17/Mar/2025 This subreddit and its regular contributors often get labeled as un-Australian. Let’s explore just how un-Australian we really are! Do you detest Vegemite? Would you
Animal welfare investigation launched into Tasmanian salmon farming
Investigation into Animal Welfare Initiated in Tasmanian Salmon Farming Industry
“Immigration is the problem with housing” says guy who had 26 properties
“‘Immigration is the cause of the housing issue,’ claims a person who owns 26 properties.”
It’s understandable that defense allocations can spark debate, especially with such a significant investment like the $3 billion pledge for additional fighter jets. While enhancing our defense capabilities is crucial, it’s also important to evaluate where our resources can have the most substantial impact. For instance, investing in cybersecurity, upgrading existing military infrastructure, or enhancing veteran support services may address pressing vulnerabilities and improve overall national security. Balancing modern needs with traditional defense measures is essential, and I think a comprehensive review of our defense strategy should guide where our funds are best allocated. What do you think should take priority?