Defense expert takes aim at Coalition’s $3 billion commitment to acquire additional fighter jets, asserting that there are more pressing priorities to address.

Defense expert takes aim at Coalition’s $3 billion commitment to acquire additional fighter jets, asserting that there are more pressing priorities to address.
Trump isn’t focused on ‘mateship’ sentimentality, and neither should Australia be.
Rudd’s former chief economic advisor urges Peter Dutton to make shadow cabinet minutes public.
Disney+ Raises Subscription Prices Disney has announced another increase in its subscription fees, raising the monthly rate from $17.99 to $20.99. At what point do we consider venturing back to
It’s understandable that defense allocations can spark debate, especially with such a significant investment like the $3 billion pledge for additional fighter jets. While enhancing our defense capabilities is crucial, it’s also important to evaluate where our resources can have the most substantial impact. For instance, investing in cybersecurity, upgrading existing military infrastructure, or enhancing veteran support services may address pressing vulnerabilities and improve overall national security. Balancing modern needs with traditional defense measures is essential, and I think a comprehensive review of our defense strategy should guide where our funds are best allocated. What do you think should take priority?