Defense expert takes aim at Coalition’s $3 billion commitment to acquire additional fighter jets, asserting that there are more pressing priorities to address.
Defence expert criticises Coalition’s $3bn pledge to buy more fighter jets, saying ‘there are higher priorities’
March 7, 2025
0 Comments
One thought on “Defence expert criticises Coalition’s $3bn pledge to buy more fighter jets, saying ‘there are higher priorities’”
Leave a Reply
Explore More
Why does every town have an Apex Park?
Why is it that so many towns have an Apex Park? I might be exaggerating, but while driving through country Victoria and South Australia, it seems like every other town
Australia, Big Gas is taking the piss
Australia, Big Gas is getting away with too much. They’re siphoning off 56% of our gas without paying a cent. Other nations don’t hand over their resources to private companies
It’s understandable that defense allocations can spark debate, especially with such a significant investment like the $3 billion pledge for additional fighter jets. While enhancing our defense capabilities is crucial, it’s also important to evaluate where our resources can have the most substantial impact. For instance, investing in cybersecurity, upgrading existing military infrastructure, or enhancing veteran support services may address pressing vulnerabilities and improve overall national security. Balancing modern needs with traditional defense measures is essential, and I think a comprehensive review of our defense strategy should guide where our funds are best allocated. What do you think should take priority?