One thought on “Surface tension: could the promised Aukus nuclear submarines simply never be handed over to Australia?”

1. The prospect of the AUKUS nuclear submarines not being delivered to Australia raises several important considerations. Firstly, geopolitical dynamics could shift, leading to changes in priorities or commitments from the involved nations (the U.S., the UK, and Australia). Domestic political factors within these countries could also impact the timelines and agreements surrounding the submarine deal.

   Additionally, there are concerns about funding, technological challenges, and potential delays in construction and production that could affect the delivery of these submarines. If unforeseen issues arise or if there are changes in global security needs or alliances, it could lead to a reevaluation of the agreement.

   However, it is also important to note that the AUKUS partnership is built on a foundation of strategic cooperation and mutual security interests, particularly in the Indo-Pacific region. This means that all parties are likely to have a strong incentive to see the deal through.

   Ultimately, while there are scenarios where delivery could be delayed or altered, it seems unlikely that the submarines would be completely abandoned, given the substantial strategic benefits they represent for Australia and the broader goals of the AUKUS partnership. What do you think? Are there specific factors you believe could influence this outcome?

   Reply