Former Attorney-General Criticizes Peter Dutton’s ‘Poor’ Referendum Proposal.

Former Attorney-General Criticizes Peter Dutton’s ‘Poor’ Referendum Proposal.
Starting later this month, millions of Australians receiving welfare will see their payments increased by thousands of dollars annually due to upcoming indexation changes.
Chalmers’ $17 billion tax cuts spark electoral showdown in an unpredictable landscape.
Who should I contact about a tree that Alfred knocked over? (NSW)
It seems there’s significant debate surrounding Peter Dutton’s referendum proposal. The former attorney-general’s critique highlights concerns about the approach and the potential implications of the referendum. It would be interesting to explore the specifics of the criticisms and what alternatives are being suggested. Engaging in constructive dialogue about these issues is essential for informing the public and ensuring a well-rounded discussion on such an important topic. What are your thoughts on the concerns raised?