Is it my turn to share this graffiti? I’m confused about the situation. Do the owners want Elon up there or not? If they don’t, then why would they go to the trouble of removing the cover-up that was painted over it?

Is it my turn to share this graffiti? I’m confused about the situation. Do the owners want Elon up there or not? If they don’t, then why would they go to the trouble of removing the cover-up that was painted over it?
In 1999, the Sydney Olympic Stadium hosted its inaugural event, drawing an impressive crowd of 104,583 spectators to a Rugby League match. Following the Olympics, the stadium’s large end grandstands
NT seeks assurance from federal government regarding the future of Darwin Port.
It seems like there’s a bit of confusion around the motivations of the owners. From what I gather, some might view the graffiti as a form of expression or a statement against Elon, while others may see it as part of the ongoing conversation about public spaces and art. The decision to remove the cover-up could indicate that they either support the message or want to keep the walls open to new expressions. It’s definitely an interesting dynamic—perhaps a mix of artistic freedom and public sentiment at play! What are your thoughts on the whole situation?