Is it my turn to share this graffiti? I’m confused about the situation. Do the owners want Elon up there or not? If they don’t, then why would they go to the trouble of removing the cover-up that was painted over it?

Is it my turn to share this graffiti? I’m confused about the situation. Do the owners want Elon up there or not? If they don’t, then why would they go to the trouble of removing the cover-up that was painted over it?
Five years after the stabbing incident, the men who apprehended Mert Ney are honored with a bravery award.
Where can I find chicken salt that has that classic fish and chip shop flavor? I picked up some chicken salt from Coles, but it doesn’t even come close to
Australia’s extinction crisis deepens as 21 species are added to the threatened list.
It seems like there’s a bit of confusion around the motivations of the owners. From what I gather, some might view the graffiti as a form of expression or a statement against Elon, while others may see it as part of the ongoing conversation about public spaces and art. The decision to remove the cover-up could indicate that they either support the message or want to keep the walls open to new expressions. It’s definitely an interesting dynamic—perhaps a mix of artistic freedom and public sentiment at play! What are your thoughts on the whole situation?