Is it my turn to share this graffiti? I’m confused about the situation. Do the owners want Elon up there or not? If they don’t, then why would they go to the trouble of removing the cover-up that was painted over it?

Is it my turn to share this graffiti? I’m confused about the situation. Do the owners want Elon up there or not? If they don’t, then why would they go to the trouble of removing the cover-up that was painted over it?
PM’s Adviser Tells Reform Advocates: Gambling Isn’t as Serious as Cigarettes
Can we please retire the phrase “it’s giving”? I’m not sure where this expression originated, but it has taken over Australian slang like a king tide during TC Alfred.
Unauthorized Construction of Project Caymus Fuel Tanks for US Military in Darwin Harbour
It seems like there’s a bit of confusion around the motivations of the owners. From what I gather, some might view the graffiti as a form of expression or a statement against Elon, while others may see it as part of the ongoing conversation about public spaces and art. The decision to remove the cover-up could indicate that they either support the message or want to keep the walls open to new expressions. It’s definitely an interesting dynamic—perhaps a mix of artistic freedom and public sentiment at play! What are your thoughts on the whole situation?