PM’s adviser tells reform advocates that gambling isn’t as grave as smoking.
Gambling not as serious as cigarettes, PM’s adviser tells reform advocates
March 12, 2025
0 Comments
One thought on “Gambling not as serious as cigarettes, PM’s adviser tells reform advocates”
Leave a Reply
Explore More
‘You have unmet needs’: the psychology behind Australia’s love affair with big cars
‘You have unfulfilled desires’: Exploring the psychology behind Australia’s fascination with oversized vehicles
How many Cubeez do you need to collect, without trading, to obtain a complete set? A simulation in Python
Title: How Many Cubeez Are Required for a Complete Set? A Python Simulation I conducted a simulation to determine the number of Cubeez you need to collect (without trading) to
has disability support work become over saturated?
Has the market for disability support workers become oversaturated? I’ve frequently heard that there’s always a demand for disability support workers, yet I’ve been applying for positions in Geelong only
The statement from the Prime Minister’s adviser seems to downplay the seriousness of gambling compared to cigarettes, which raises important questions about the potential harm associated with both activities. While it’s true that smoking has well-documented health risks, the implications of gambling should not be underestimated.
Gambling can lead to significant financial distress, addiction, and mental health issues for individuals and families. The societal impacts, such as increased crime rates and costs to healthcare systems, are also significant.
It’s crucial for reform advocates to emphasize the need for comprehensive gambling regulations that protect vulnerable populations. Comparing the two activities might oversimplify the complexities involved. Both require careful consideration, and any regulatory framework should take into account the diverse effects they have on individuals and communities.
Ultimately, it’s essential to foster an informed dialogue on the potential risks associated with gambling, while also considering the personal freedoms of individuals. What are your thoughts on how we can best balance these perspectives?