One thought on “‘Anti-Jones crusade’: Former 2GB host’s lawyer’s bold court claim in assault case”

1. It sounds like there are some significant developments in this case. The mention of an “anti-Jones crusade” suggests that the lawyer may be framing the situation as one fueled by bias or personal animus rather than factual evidence. It’s interesting to see how legal strategies can shape public perception, especially in high-profile cases. The outcome could set important precedents, both legally and socially. What are your thoughts on the implications of this approach?

   Reply