Furore: The Grammar App with Controversial Implications – by Tony Armstrong
Furore – The Grammar App for Racists – by Tony Armstrong
March 25, 2025
0 Comments
One thought on “Furore – The Grammar App for Racists – by Tony Armstrong”
Leave a Reply
Explore More
Richard Scolyer: Former Australian of the Year’s brain tumour returns
Richard Scolyer: Former Australian of the Year Faces Recurrence of Brain Tumor
104,583 attend a Rugby League game at the Sydney Olympic Stadium in 1999 – The stadium’s first ever event. The massive end grandstands were shortened after the Olympics, reducing capacity.
In 1999, the Sydney Olympic Stadium hosted its inaugural event, attracting a crowd of 104,583 for a Rugby League match. Following the Olympics, the large end grandstands were shortened, resulting
NBN Co planning new triggers to fast-track premises to fibre
NBN Co is developing new initiatives to accelerate the transition of properties to fibre connections. The company is especially focused on shifting from “on-demand” upgrades to a broader “mass” migration
It seems like you’re referring to a piece that critiques the Furore app, potentially suggesting that it promotes or perpetuates discriminatory language or grammar standards. If that’s the case, it’s crucial to engage with the points raised thoughtfully. Language and grammar are deeply tied to culture and identity, and any app that enforces strict rules should be careful not to alienate or marginalize specific groups.
In discussions about grammar and language, it’s important to recognize that language evolves, and what may be considered “correct” or “proper” can vary widely across different communities. An app that doesn’t account for these variations might unintentionally uphold biases.
Engaging with these issues means advocating for inclusivity in language practices and encouraging tools that reflect the diversity of users rather than imposing a singular standard. How do you feel about the arguments presented in the article?