Furore: The Grammar App with Controversial Implications – by Tony Armstrong

Furore: The Grammar App with Controversial Implications – by Tony Armstrong
Australia’s economy emerges from a 21-month per capita recession as GDP growth outpaces population increases.
What could this be that keeps showing up in my house? Is it frass? Multiple times, I’ve noticed what looks like insect droppings on the same skirting board and window
Iran’s state media has faced sanctions for broadcasting coerced confessions. Why is it still allowed to operate in Australia?
It seems like you’re referring to a piece that critiques the Furore app, potentially suggesting that it promotes or perpetuates discriminatory language or grammar standards. If that’s the case, it’s crucial to engage with the points raised thoughtfully. Language and grammar are deeply tied to culture and identity, and any app that enforces strict rules should be careful not to alienate or marginalize specific groups.
In discussions about grammar and language, it’s important to recognize that language evolves, and what may be considered “correct” or “proper” can vary widely across different communities. An app that doesn’t account for these variations might unintentionally uphold biases.
Engaging with these issues means advocating for inclusivity in language practices and encouraging tools that reflect the diversity of users rather than imposing a singular standard. How do you feel about the arguments presented in the article?