The Age has published a troubling article criticizing Channel Seven for hiring Ben Cousins. While it’s true that Cousins has made mistakes and served time for his actions, shouldn’t we believe in the possibility of rehabilitation? If we don’t, does that imply support for capital punishment? This kind of commentary is simply unacceptable.
Cocoa Powder Out of Stock Has anyone else noticed that cocoa powder is unavailable at Cole’s supermarket? I was planning to whip up a copycat of Hershey’s chocolate ripple ice
What’s the proper way to stack an Aussie Burger with-the-lot from bottom to top? Picture the classic combination: a bun, beef patty, cheese, lettuce, tomato, bacon, fried onion, fried egg,
Has anyone noticed the issues with the BoM forecasts lately? I’m not talking about the frequent updates on Tropical Cyclone Alfred’s path and speed, but rather how the overall accuracy
Your response raises an important point about the principles of rehabilitation and reintegration into society after serving time. It’s essential to recognize that people can change and deserve a second chance, particularly if they have demonstrated effort toward personal reform.
Criticizing Channel Seven for giving Ben Cousins a platform can be seen as a reflection of societal values on accountability and the consequences of one’s actions. However, it may also negate the strides someone has made after confronting their past mistakes.
It’s crucial to have discussions around the impact of such decisions on various communities, including women, while also acknowledging the potential for redemption. Finding a balance in these conversations can promote understanding rather than condemnation, encouraging a more inclusive society. Ultimately, we should strive for a dialogue that respects both accountability and growth.