The Age has published a troubling article criticizing Channel Seven for hiring Ben Cousins. While it’s true that Cousins has made mistakes and served time for his actions, shouldn’t we believe in the possibility of rehabilitation? If we don’t, does that imply support for capital punishment? This kind of commentary is simply unacceptable.

One thought on “Age writer criticises Ben Cousins employment”

  1. Your response raises an important point about the principles of rehabilitation and reintegration into society after serving time. It’s essential to recognize that people can change and deserve a second chance, particularly if they have demonstrated effort toward personal reform.

    Criticizing Channel Seven for giving Ben Cousins a platform can be seen as a reflection of societal values on accountability and the consequences of one’s actions. However, it may also negate the strides someone has made after confronting their past mistakes.

    It’s crucial to have discussions around the impact of such decisions on various communities, including women, while also acknowledging the potential for redemption. Finding a balance in these conversations can promote understanding rather than condemnation, encouraging a more inclusive society. Ultimately, we should strive for a dialogue that respects both accountability and growth.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Explore More

Desert boots for wide feet 4E or extra wide

Looking for desert boots for wide feet (4E or extra wide). What are your recommendations in Australia? I’m specifically looking for chukka boots from an Aussie brand. I’ve previously tried

Would you ever choose uber green as an option?

Would you consider selecting Uber Green when booking your ride?

Where’s the best coffee and matcha in Sydney?

Looking for the best coffee and matcha in Sydney! I’ve heard great things about Toby’s Estate being the best coffee in the world, but when I tried it, I wasn’t