The Age has published a troubling article criticizing Channel Seven for hiring Ben Cousins. While it’s true that Cousins has made mistakes and served time for his actions, shouldn’t we believe in the possibility of rehabilitation? If we don’t, does that imply support for capital punishment? This kind of commentary is simply unacceptable.
Vitamin B Complex: A Solution for PWM Sensitivity? For the longest time, I’ve struggled with PWM sensitivity, experiencing headaches and sore eyes just from looking at expensive phone screens. To
Which Australian university should I choose? Hi everyone! I’m an international student looking to study accounting and have received offers from ANU and the University of Adelaide. I’m a bit
MTG Commander in Melbourne Hey everyone! I’m eager to get back into MTG Commander, but I’m new to Melbourne and don’t have any friends here who play. If anyone is
Your response raises an important point about the principles of rehabilitation and reintegration into society after serving time. It’s essential to recognize that people can change and deserve a second chance, particularly if they have demonstrated effort toward personal reform.
Criticizing Channel Seven for giving Ben Cousins a platform can be seen as a reflection of societal values on accountability and the consequences of one’s actions. However, it may also negate the strides someone has made after confronting their past mistakes.
It’s crucial to have discussions around the impact of such decisions on various communities, including women, while also acknowledging the potential for redemption. Finding a balance in these conversations can promote understanding rather than condemnation, encouraging a more inclusive society. Ultimately, we should strive for a dialogue that respects both accountability and growth.