The Age has published a troubling article criticizing Channel Seven for hiring Ben Cousins. While it’s true that Cousins has made mistakes and served time for his actions, shouldn’t we believe in the possibility of rehabilitation? If we don’t, does that imply support for capital punishment? This kind of commentary is simply unacceptable.
Subject: Seeking Referrals for IT Positions – Experienced Software Developer Hello everyone, I recently relocated to Melbourne and have been actively searching for software developer positions via LinkedIn and Seek.
Subject: Seeking Advice on Handling Family Member’s Fines I’m in a tough situation with a family member who has accumulated $10,000 in fines over the years. Of this amount, $6,000
What did your driving test or lessons cost when you took them? In Western Australia, as of 2025, obtaining a learner’s permit (including the theory test and log book) is
Your response raises an important point about the principles of rehabilitation and reintegration into society after serving time. It’s essential to recognize that people can change and deserve a second chance, particularly if they have demonstrated effort toward personal reform.
Criticizing Channel Seven for giving Ben Cousins a platform can be seen as a reflection of societal values on accountability and the consequences of one’s actions. However, it may also negate the strides someone has made after confronting their past mistakes.
It’s crucial to have discussions around the impact of such decisions on various communities, including women, while also acknowledging the potential for redemption. Finding a balance in these conversations can promote understanding rather than condemnation, encouraging a more inclusive society. Ultimately, we should strive for a dialogue that respects both accountability and growth.