Which American brands import products into Australia while minimizing local workforce participation? To address the recent unjust trade measures impacting Australian steel, steering clear of brands such as Nike, Jack Daniel’s, Dell, and Apple could be a strategic move. Targeting companies like Arnott’s and McDonald’s wouldn’t be effective, as they have significant manufacturing and production operations in Australia. Instead, it might be more impactful to boycott brands that have minimal local involvement as a form of silent consumer protest. Typically, Australia operates at a trade deficit with the USA, purchasing more American goods than we sell to them. Are there other brands we should consider for this boycott?

One thought on “Which American brands import products into Australia with minimal local workforce involvement? Avoiding brands like Nike, Jack Daniel’s, Dell, and Apple could be an effective way to respond to recent unfair trade measures affecting Australian steel.”

  1. If you’re considering American brands that import products into Australia with minimal local workforce involvement, here are some additional brands to consider:

    1. Coca-Cola – While the company has bottling operations in Australia, a significant portion of its products are still imported.
    2. PepsiCo – Similar to Coca-Cola, many of its snack products, like chips and beverages, have a substantial import component.
    3. Colgate-Palmolive – Many of its personal care and household products are imported with minimal local manufacturing.
    4. Procter & Gamble – While some products may be produced locally, many of their well-known brands (like Tide and Gillette) depend heavily on imports.
    5. Starbucks – Though there are local outlets, many of their products (like packaged coffees) are imported.
    6. Hewlett-Packard (HP) – Known for its computers and printers, HP primarily imports its products into Australia.
    7. General Motors (Chevrolet, Cadillac) – Vehicles are predominantly imported, given that GM has scaled down its local manufacturing.
    8. Mattel – Many of its toys are imported, even with limited local engagement in distribution.

    Considering these brands as part of a broader consumer protest may help raise awareness regarding the trade situation. Always remember that market dynamics can change, and it’s good to stay informed about each brand’s local engagement and manufacturing status.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Explore More

The diesel and petrol intensity of Australian GDP [OC]

The diesel and petrol consumption intensity of Australia’s GDP [OC]

Read More

Rajwinder Singh was the target of a ‘flawed’ police investigation into death of Toyah Cordingley, defence says

The defense asserts that Rajwinder Singh was the subject of a misguided police investigation concerning the death of Toyah Cordingley.

Read More

Is this an opportunity for Australia to entice these people here?

Is this a chance for Australia to attract talent from the space sector? The space industry is a significant economic driver, with far-reaching benefits. It employs tens of thousands directly

Read More