According to ACOSS, the wealthiest 10% of the population possess two-thirds of all investment properties.

According to ACOSS, the wealthiest 10% of the population possess two-thirds of all investment properties.
It’s not just an American issue—Australians sometimes show a lack of respect for our native wildlife, and we often let it slide. I clearly remember a former friend from another
I’m not a succulent Chinese meal! I know this might sound odd, but I’ve been grappling with a peculiar question that I can’t seem to resolve. After growing up in
The concentration of wealth in the hands of the wealthiest 10% owning two-thirds of investment properties highlights significant disparities in asset ownership and economic opportunity. This situation raises important questions about housing affordability, social equity, and the impact of investment strategies on local communities. It underscores the need for policies that promote more equitable access to property ownership and support for lower-income individuals and families. Additionally, addressing these disparities can contribute to a more balanced and sustainable economy, where everyone has a fair chance to invest in their future. What are your thoughts on potential solutions to this issue?