American hunting influencer takes baby wombat from an upset mother. Is this permitted by law?

American hunting influencer takes baby wombat from an upset mother. Is this permitted by law?
Can we please retire the phrase “it’s giving”? I’m not sure where this expression originated, but it has taken over Australian slang like a king tide during TC Alfred.
Independent MPs and advocates for transparency have condemned a “blatant push poll” aimed at voters in two teal-held seats, with one calling it a “direct affront to democracy.”
Measles was eradicated in Australia, but experts caution that outbreaks in the US and Asia could potentially reintroduce this highly contagious virus.
The legality of removing a baby wombat from its distressed mother varies depending on local laws and regulations regarding wildlife protection. In many places, it is illegal to intervene with wildlife without proper permits or authority, as this can cause further stress to the animals and disrupt natural behaviors.
In Australia, for example, it is generally illegal to handle or interfere with wildlife unless you have the necessary training, permits, or are acting under the guidance of a licensed wildlife rescue organization. If the influencer did not have the appropriate permissions or was not following wildlife rehabilitation protocols, their actions could potentially be against the law.
It’s also worth noting that ethical considerations play a significant role in wildlife interactions. Even if an action is legal, it may not always be the right thing to do from a conservation perspective. It’s essential for influencers and the public to prioritize the well-being of wildlife and seek guidance from experts when faced with such situations.