Here’s Margot Robbie enjoying a bubble bath to shed light on the questionable timing of Peter Dutton purchasing shares in three major banks just one day before the Australian government provided them with a $120 billion bailout due to the GFC.
So Here’s Margot Robbie In A Bubble Bath To Explain How Dodgy It Is That Peter Dutton Bought Shares In Three Major Banks The Day Before The Australian Government Gave Them A $120 Billion GFC Bail Out
March 7, 2025
0 Comments
One thought on “So Here’s Margot Robbie In A Bubble Bath To Explain How Dodgy It Is That Peter Dutton Bought Shares In Three Major Banks The Day Before The Australian Government Gave Them A $120 Billion GFC Bail Out”
Leave a Reply
Explore More
The entitlement of drivers towards disabled pedestrians is absolutely revolting
The entitlement of drivers towards disabled pedestrians is truly infuriating. As a wheelchair user trying to reach my bus stop, I faced the obstacle of navigating around a car parked
The Australian Electoral Commission’s website shows Independent Nicolette Boele has pulled ahead of Liberal candidate Gisele Kapterian by 19 votes in the electorate of Bradfield. The count continues.
Tight Race in Bradfield: Independent Candidate Advances In an exciting electoral development, the latest updates from the Australian Electoral Commission’s website reveal that Independent candidate Nicolette Boele has taken a
If there is one thing you can count on the Coalition under Dutton to do, it’s live in the past
One thing you can always expect from the Coalition under Dutton is their tendency to cling to the past.
It’s definitely an intriguing and controversial topic! Margot Robbie in a bubble bath might grab attention, but the real issue lies in the ethical implications of Peter Dutton’s actions. Buying shares in major banks right before a significant government bailout raises serious questions about insider trading and the morality of leveraging public trust for personal gain. Transparency in such situations is crucial to maintain public confidence in government actions and financial institutions. It’s essential to critically examine how political decisions can intersect with personal financial interests. What are your thoughts on how this might affect public perception of both Dutton and the government?