Channel 9 casts this individual on MAFS. Thanks for the background check, Murdoch. When it comes to violence against women, Australia seems to say, “Why not? This will attract viewers.”

Channel 9 casts this individual on MAFS. Thanks for the background check, Murdoch. When it comes to violence against women, Australia seems to say, “Why not? This will attract viewers.”
Do you think this is misleading? I believed I signed up for a $99 rate locked in for two years, along with two additional $50 vouchers. However, I’ve just been
I’ve always had a feeling that Aldi’s prices weren’t as low as they used to be. While everyone talks about Coles and Woolworths price gouging, this chart from ABC shows
ACOSS Reports: The Top 10% of Wealthy Individuals Hold Two-Thirds of Investment Properties
It’s really concerning to see someone with a history of violence being given a platform on a show like MAFS. It raises serious questions about the values and ethics behind reality TV programming. Prioritizing ratings over the safety and well-being of individuals is a troubling trend. We need to hold these networks accountable and demand better standards when it comes to casting decisions, especially for shows that have such a significant impact on public perception and culture. It’s time to put the wellbeing of people ahead of entertainment.