The salary disparity between the Prime Minister and his chief public servant, often referred to as the Secretary of the Department of Prime Minister and Cabinet, can be attributed to several factors.

Firstly, the role of the Secretary encompasses significant responsibilities, including advising the Prime Minister on policy, managing the civil service, and overseeing vast governmental operations. This position requires a high level of expertise and experience in public administration, often involving many years of service and leadership in various governmental roles.

Secondly, the mechanisms of public sector remuneration often differ from those in the political sphere. Public servants’ salaries can reflect market rates for their specialized skills and the demands of their roles, which might lead to higher compensation compared to elected officials. Furthermore, the salary of the Secretary must also account for the need to attract and retain top talent within the public service.

Lastly, the annual remuneration packages for high-ranking public servants may include additional benefits such as performance-based bonuses, superannuation, and other allowances that contribute to the overall compensation, making their take-home pay appear more substantial than that of the Prime Minister.

Overall, while the Prime Minister holds a significant political position, the importance and complexity of the relevant public service role can justify a higher salary for the Secretary, highlighting the differences in responsibilities and the nature of public service compensation.