The phrase reflects a growing concern among Australians about recent governmental decisions involving international agreements or trade deals that may not serve the best interests of the country. The implications of “stupidity” versus “corruption” suggest a debate about whether these agreements stem from a lack of knowledge and poor judgment on the part of policymakers, or if they involve ulterior motives and unethical practices benefiting specific interests over the general populace.

In this context, Australians are questioning the rationale behind certain deals, especially when the outcomes appear to disadvantage local industries, environmental standards, or economic conditions. Critics argue that some agreements seem to favor foreign entities at the expense of national interests, raising suspicions about the motivations of those involved in the negotiation process. The public discourse often revolves around the necessity for greater transparency and accountability in such dealings, urging the government to prioritize the welfare of citizens and the integrity of Australian sovereignty.